Okay, sorry, I simply need a hole to scream into. I’ll be done in a minute.
For those who examine the present crop of "artificial intelligence" tools,
you’ll ultimately come throughout the word "hallucinate." It’s used as a shorthand for any occasion where
the software program simply, like, makes
stuff up: An error, a mistake, a factual misstep - a lie.
An "AI" assist bot informs customers about a change to a company’s phrases of service -
a change that didn’t really happen? Some law firms used "AI" to file a
brief riddled with "false, inaccurate, and misleading" citations?
A chatbot on a rightwing social media website decides
to start advancing racist conspiracy theories, even when no person requested?
I have a semantic quibble I’d like to lodge. Everything - every thing - that comes out of these "AI"
platforms is a "hallucination." Quite merely, these services are
slot machines for content. They’re enjoying probabilities: if you ask a large language model a question, it
returns answers aligned with the traits and patterns
they’ve analyzed of their coaching data.1 These platforms have no idea when they get things fallacious; they definitely
do not know once they get things right. |
 |
| 2026/01/26(Mon) 18:27 |
|